we1shnewby wrote:happymanc wrote:Unless a league official is present in an independent capacity it is always 1v1. With no admissions of guilt what chance is there of a balanced decision being reached?
I think this may vary from league to league. My wife is league secretary and attends nearly all of our eldest sons games, but she is only there as a parent and not in an
official capacity. Even though she has witnessed, porr refereeing, cheating linesman and coaches, parents and coaches over stepping the mark. She cant do anything about it because she is there as a
parent.
This is done from a safety aspect for the league officials, so nobody can say to them (althought they do) your on the league - do something about it.
When she attends a game in an official capacity, which happens at random games from time to time, she has to let the managers know who she is, wear her league badge and jacket. Even then with the obvious attendance people still act like muppets, but its at this stage that she can take action and report individuals or teams.
In my first season coaching, a coach of an older age group (u14) regularly took his team off (6 times that season) and on all but one of those occasions he lost the points at the hearing, although each time it was done with child protection in mind. A submitted referees report helped him out on the other one and the game got replayed.